spiffyzha
Carnivorous Plant Addict
Probably the last update on Round 1 Science:
* The trap that was re-digesting the cricket is done re-digesting. I didn't even notice when it opened back up, so I'm not sure how long it was closed. Bleh.
* The drosera leaves have all mostly relaxed back to their normal not-eating shape, with the exception of the leaf that got the betta food pellet. I guess that one's still being eaten slightly?
* I could swear one of my two experimental pinguicula (crickets + yeast) looks like it's grown more than the other one, but if I judge by counting new leaves, the smaller one (osmocote + fish food) wins.
* While I guess it *could* be indicative of growth patterns from different nutrient profiles, this is clearly just a thing that needs way more statistics before drawing any real conclusions. Story of my life.
* I *do* have an awful lot of baby pinguicula right now. Maybe I could let them grow up a bit more and do some science on them before trying to give them all away again. The real worry here is if I let them get too big, it starts to get expensive to mail them to people.
Pinguicula growth, for reference purposes:
A bit of new science:
* I fed nutritional yeast to a couple other VFT plants:
- The only (super tiny) trap on a very young plant, and
- A large trap that already looked a bit "old", on a fairly big plant
* The goal with this is to see if nutritional yeast is reliably safe to feed to plants, or if it will sometimes kill the trap. I'll probably have to just keep re-doing this until a trap eventually dies.
* I also want to point out again that nutritional yeast is probably not great as the plants' *only* food source, since it basically has no potassium or phosphorous, which are both things that plants find delicious.
* This isn't really science, but more just a change in protocol for me: every pitcher-based plant that has a sufficiently large pitcher (and one that didn't..) got an osmocote pellet a while back. Some (but not all) with multiple pitchers got a pellet in each pitcher. This is a change in feeding procedure from my previous "they're on their own" methodology. I don't really know how I can evaluate the results, since I don't have any plant-twins to use as a control for that one, and I'm expecting them to appreciate the increasing seasonal light levels anyway, except for a couple of weirdo nepenthes that seem to think my north-facing windowsill has too many photons at this time of year.
* The trap that was re-digesting the cricket is done re-digesting. I didn't even notice when it opened back up, so I'm not sure how long it was closed. Bleh.
* The drosera leaves have all mostly relaxed back to their normal not-eating shape, with the exception of the leaf that got the betta food pellet. I guess that one's still being eaten slightly?
* I could swear one of my two experimental pinguicula (crickets + yeast) looks like it's grown more than the other one, but if I judge by counting new leaves, the smaller one (osmocote + fish food) wins.
* While I guess it *could* be indicative of growth patterns from different nutrient profiles, this is clearly just a thing that needs way more statistics before drawing any real conclusions. Story of my life.
* I *do* have an awful lot of baby pinguicula right now. Maybe I could let them grow up a bit more and do some science on them before trying to give them all away again. The real worry here is if I let them get too big, it starts to get expensive to mail them to people.
Pinguicula growth, for reference purposes:
A bit of new science:
* I fed nutritional yeast to a couple other VFT plants:
- The only (super tiny) trap on a very young plant, and
- A large trap that already looked a bit "old", on a fairly big plant
* The goal with this is to see if nutritional yeast is reliably safe to feed to plants, or if it will sometimes kill the trap. I'll probably have to just keep re-doing this until a trap eventually dies.
* I also want to point out again that nutritional yeast is probably not great as the plants' *only* food source, since it basically has no potassium or phosphorous, which are both things that plants find delicious.
* This isn't really science, but more just a change in protocol for me: every pitcher-based plant that has a sufficiently large pitcher (and one that didn't..) got an osmocote pellet a while back. Some (but not all) with multiple pitchers got a pellet in each pitcher. This is a change in feeding procedure from my previous "they're on their own" methodology. I don't really know how I can evaluate the results, since I don't have any plant-twins to use as a control for that one, and I'm expecting them to appreciate the increasing seasonal light levels anyway, except for a couple of weirdo nepenthes that seem to think my north-facing windowsill has too many photons at this time of year.